Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs Synap

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
B
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
Synapcom.linkrra/synap
C
No reviews yet

Synap (pool.linkrra.com/v1), Linkrra's OpenAI-compatible LLM API, as an MCP server.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fidelis Memory (83/100 against 69). Synap is hosted and callable through the gateway; Fidelis Memory runs on your own machine. Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis MemorySynap
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100C69/100
AdoptionGrowingNew
GitHub stars23
Downloads / week382
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools2
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMIT
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons