Mmcp.market

Head to head

Fidelis Memory vs Echocache

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Fidelis Memoryio.github.hermes-labs-ai/fidelis-memory
B
No reviews yet

Recall locally stored agent memories through an MCP-compatible host.

Full listing
Echocacheio.github.kskurtveit/echocache
A
No reviews yet

MCP server caching expensive LLM responses: HTTP-style freshness plus semantic recall.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Echocache (92/100 against 83). Fidelis Memory has noticeably more public adoption.

 Fidelis MemoryEchocache
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB83/100A92/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars230
Downloads / week38252
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—6
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-10
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

Fidelis Memory vs Total Agent MemoryFidelis Memory vs Hicortex — AI Fleet MemoryFidelis Memory vs Agent Memory OsFidelis Memory vs Claude Real VideoFidelis Memory vs IWEAll AI and agents servers