Head to head
Engram vs LoreConvo
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first persistent memory for AI agents — SQLite + local embeddings, MCP-native, no cloud.
Full listingLoreConvo
Bio.github.labyrinth-analytics/loreconvoNo reviews yet
Local-first persistent session memory for Claude Code and other agents. SQLite + FTS5, no cloud.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Engram (88/100 against 80).
| Engram | LoreConvo | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A88/100 | B80/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 10 |
| Downloads / week | 46 | 140 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 6 | 40 |
| Write actions | 1 | 5 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-07-07 | 2026-09-25 |
| Category | Databases | Databases |