Mmcp.market

Head to head

HOL Guard vs Yotta Verify

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
C
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing
Yotta Verifyio.github.YottaMeta/yotta-verify-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Pre-install security scanner for AI agent skills (local stdio MCP). Offline static scan; no upload.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Yotta Verify (91/100 against 60). HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.

 HOL GuardYotta Verify
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100A91/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars6300
Downloads / week–567
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools6—
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-192026-09-15
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

HOL Guard vs mcpmHOL Guard vs Agent-Native ChatHOL Guard vs haiku.ragHOL Guard vs Munim Computer UseHOL Guard vs prompt-protectionAll AI and agents servers