Mmcp.market

Head to head

HOL Guard vs MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
A
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing
MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACTio.github.wmujahid428-web/trust-layer
C
No reviews yet

MUJ428 verifies intent and evidence before consequential AI-agent actions.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HOL Guard (86/100 against 57). MUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT is hosted and callable through the gateway; HOL Guard runs on your own machine. HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.

 HOL GuardMUJ428 Trust Layer — VERIFY BEFORE ACT
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100C57/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars630–
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—14
Write actions—1
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

HOL Guard vs mcpmHOL Guard vs Agent-Native ChatHOL Guard vs CHAP CoordinatorHOL Guard vs haiku.ragHOL Guard vs DvalincodeAll AI and agents servers