Mmcp.market

Head to head

HOL Guard vs Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
A
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing
Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Providercom.scriptmasterlabs/provider-trust
C
No reviews yet

Verify a source or provider before an AI agent trusts it. Evidence only; unknown stays unknown.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HOL Guard (86/100 against 69). Provider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider is hosted and callable through the gateway; HOL Guard runs on your own machine. HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.

 HOL GuardProvider Trust — Verify a Source or Provider
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100C69/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars630
Downloads / week
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools6
Write actions
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons