Mmcp.market

Head to head

HOL Guard vs Fde Agent

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

HOL Guardio.github.hashgraph-online/hol-guard
A
No reviews yet

Local-first AI agent security evidence and approval workflows through HOL Guard's stdio MCP server.

Full listing
Fde Agentio.github.minjikim89/fde-agent
C
No reviews yet

Diagnose AI workflows for failure, security, and handoff risks — RED/AMBER/GREEN per node.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HOL Guard (86/100 against 67). Fde Agent is hosted and callable through the gateway; HOL Guard runs on your own machine. HOL Guard has noticeably more public adoption.

 HOL GuardFde Agent
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA86/100C67/100
AdoptionEstablishedNew
GitHub stars630–
Downloads / week––
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools—1
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0—
Last release2026-09-19—
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons