Head to head
HasData YouTube vs Court Records
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search YouTube and read video, channel and transcript data as JSON. No Google Cloud project.
Full listingCourt Records
Cio.github.mrfentmen/court-records-mcpNo reviews yet
Search published US court opinions from the Caselaw Access Project. No key required.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours HasData YouTube (100/100 against 65). HasData YouTube is hosted and callable through the gateway; Court Records runs on your own machine. HasData YouTube has noticeably more public adoption.
| HasData YouTube | Court Records | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A100/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | — |
| GitHub stars | 6 | – |
| Downloads / week | 249 | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-14 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |