Head to head
Google Surf vs WattScope
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Web, academic and code search with graph RAG, data lineage, ontology and cross-project schema links.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Tracks the estimated carbon footprint of AI model usage, per org and project.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Google Surf (83/100 against 70). WattScope is hosted and callable through the gateway; Google Surf runs on your own machine. Google Surf has noticeably more public adoption.
| Google Surf | WattScope | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 290 | – |
| Downloads / week | 438 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 7 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-10 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |