Mmcp.market

Head to head

RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Actionio.github.GSterlingPress/recover
A
No reviews yet

Choose the safest next action after an API, MCP, or agent failure before retrying.

Full listing
MCP Serverio.github.pathmodeio/mcp-server
B
No reviews yet

Deterministic intent preflight before your agent builds: six gates, keyless, no model call.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (88 and 82 out of 100). RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Server runs on your own machine.

 RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine ActionMCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA88/100B82/100
AdoptionGrowingGrowing
GitHub stars02
Downloads / week–691
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools1—
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—NOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-132026-09-01
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

RECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs MCPRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs ProjectmemRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs Agent-Native ChatRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs GitWarrenRECOVER — Decide Safely After a Failed Machine Action vs LockstepAll AI and agents servers