Head to head
ONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs Lockstep
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
ONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions
Bio.github.GSterlingPress/onceNo reviews yet
Prevent duplicate AI-agent side effects with idempotency, verification, and durable receipts.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Decision memory for AI coding agents: captures decisions once, briefs every agent before it acts.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Lockstep (91/100 against 79). ONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions is hosted and callable through the gateway; Lockstep runs on your own machine. Lockstep has noticeably more public adoption.
| ONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions | Lockstep | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B79/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 10 |
| Downloads / week | – | 175 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 2 | 19 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-13 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |
Other comparisons
ONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs Agent-Native ChatONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs MCPONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs AuscaONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs ProtectONCE — Exactly-Once Reliability for AI Agent Actions vs FormioAll AI and agents servers