Mmcp.market

Head to head

Abnormal MCP Server vs SearXNG Search

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

Abnormal MCP Serverio.github.GregDog/mcp-server-abnormal
B
No reviews yet

Abnormal Security MCP: threats, search, remediation, ATO cases, vendor/BEC, and evidence download.

Full listing
SearXNG Searchio.github.ihor-sokoliuk/mcp-searxng
B
No reviews yet

MCP server for SearXNG — privacy-respecting web search with pagination, URL reading

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours SearXNG Search (83/100 against 73). SearXNG Search has noticeably more public adoption.

 Abnormal MCP ServerSearXNG Search
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB73/100B83/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars01.2k
Downloads / week–13k
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-172026-09-18
CategoryWeb searchWeb search

Other comparisons

Abnormal MCP Server vs socraticodeAbnormal MCP Server vs pubmed-mcp-serverAbnormal MCP Server vs GitHitsAbnormal MCP Server vs Google Maps MCP ServerAbnormal MCP Server vs OctocodeAll Web search servers