Head to head
Grafana vs UTF-8 non-ASCII byte count, input discarded
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (98 and 91 out of 100). Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| Grafana | UTF-8 non-ASCII byte count, input discarded | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | 30 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |