Head to head
mcp-grafana vs simframe
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Always-warm iOS Simulator and Android emulator frames: agents read the screen in ~20ms
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcp-grafana (98/100 against 74). mcp-grafana is hosted and callable through the gateway; simframe runs on your own machine. mcp-grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcp-grafana | simframe | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3.5k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 2.0k |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |