Head to head
Link vs Servana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local personal memory for agents as MCP tools — remember, recall, search, context, graph traversal.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Search and message local service vendors (cleaning, med spa, yoga, personal training) by city.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Link (92/100 against 60). Servana is hosted and callable through the gateway; Link runs on your own machine. Link has noticeably more public adoption.
| Link | Servana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C60/100 |
| Adoption | Established | New |
| GitHub stars | 182 | – |
| Downloads / week | 197 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 5 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |