Head to head
Endnote vs TBRP Codex
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Endnote
Aio.github.gokmengokhan/endnote-mcpNo reviews yet
Search, cite, and read PDFs from your EndNote library in Claude Desktop
Full listing
No reviews yet
Search, read and cite a researcher's own library and the canonical corpora on tbrp.app.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Endnote (92/100 against 70). TBRP Codex is hosted and callable through the gateway; Endnote runs on your own machine. Endnote has noticeably more public adoption.
| Endnote | TBRP Codex | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B70/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 47 | – |
| Downloads / week | 76 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | AGPL-3.0 | — |
| Last release | 2026-09-05 | — |
| Category | Web search | Web search |