Head to head
Githunt vs three.ws Signals
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search, rank, and analyze GitHub developers for tech recruiting via GitHunt's API.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Discover signal feeds ranked by proven edge, rank publishers, and subscribe + track results.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Githunt (92/100 against 83). Githunt is hosted and callable through the gateway; three.ws Signals runs on your own machine. three.ws Signals has noticeably more public adoption.
| Githunt | three.ws Signals | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 206 |
| Downloads / week | 23 | 41 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-07-24 | 2026-09-22 |
| Category | SEO | SEO |