Head to head
GitHits vs autorouter
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Full listing
No reviews yet
An MCP capability router: one search tool instead of every server's tool schema.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 86 out of 100). GitHits is hosted and callable through the gateway; autorouter runs on your own machine. GitHits has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitHits | autorouter | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A86/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 107 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 2.3k | 633 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 2 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |