Head to head
GitHits vs TinyFish Guided Research
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHits (98/100 against 83). GitHits is hosted and callable through the gateway; TinyFish Guided Research runs on your own machine. GitHits has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitHits | TinyFish Guided Research | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 107 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 2.3k | 105 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |