Head to head
GitHits vs Marm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search public open-source code, documentation, metadata, vulnerabilities, changelogs, and examples.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours GitHits (92/100 against 74). GitHits is hosted and callable through the gateway; Marm runs on your own machine. GitHits has noticeably more public adoption.
| GitHits | Marm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | B74/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 107 | 380 |
| Downloads / week | 3.1k | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |