Head to head
MCP vs Seatable
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Find the repo to build from: search 100k+ repos by base-fitness, clone free or buy over x402.
Full listing
No reviews yet
MCP server for SeaTable — read, write, search, link, and query data in your bases
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Seatable (94/100 against 57). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Seatable runs on your own machine. Seatable has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP | Seatable | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 9 |
| Downloads / week | – | 97 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 16 | 23 |
| Write actions | 4 | 6 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-04 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |