Mmcp.market

Head to head

haiku.rag vs Pursers

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

haiku.ragio.github.ggozad/haiku-rag
A
No reviews yet

Local-first agentic RAG with citations - hybrid search, reranking, multimodal document retrieval

Full listing
Pursersio.github.swisspra/pursers
B
No reviews yet

Coordinate AI-agent work on a local-first, owner-controlled MCP board

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours haiku.rag (92/100 against 83). haiku.rag has noticeably more public adoption.

 haiku.ragPursers
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B83/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars6091
Downloads / week–253
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools——
Write actions——
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITApache-2.0
Last release2026-09-182026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

haiku.rag vs ha-mcphaiku.rag vs IWEhaiku.rag vs fiori-mcp-serverhaiku.rag vs mcp-local-raghaiku.rag vs mcp-ts-coreAll AI and agents servers