Head to head
haiku.rag vs Loom
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first agentic RAG with citations - hybrid search, reranking, multimodal document retrieval
Full listingLoom
Cio.github.KlossKarl/loomNo reviews yet
Local-first personal knowledge base. Cited answers from your vault via vector + graph retrieval.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours haiku.rag (92/100 against 65). haiku.rag has noticeably more public adoption.
| haiku.rag | Loom | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | Established | — |
| GitHub stars | 609 | – |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |