Head to head
YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs Octocode
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP
?com.getyoutubetranscript/youtube-transcript-and-youtube-searchNo reviews yet
YouTube transcripts, search, channel browsing, and playlists for AI agents via MCP.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Octocode runs on your own machine. Octocode has noticeably more public adoption.
| YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP | Octocode | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | ? | A94/100 |
| Adoption | — | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 475 |
| Downloads / week | – | 467 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |
Other comparisons
YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs socraticodeYouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs SearXNG SearchYouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs pubmed-mcp-serverYouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs GitHitsYouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs Google Maps MCP ServerAll Web search servers