Head to head
YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP vs Marm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP
Bcom.getyoutubetranscript/youtube-transcript-and-youtube-searchNo reviews yet
YouTube transcripts, search, channel browsing, and playlists for AI agents via MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Marm (92/100 against 84). YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; Marm runs on your own machine. Marm has noticeably more public adoption.
| YouTube Transcript + YouTube Search MCP | Marm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B84/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 383 |
| Downloads / week | – | 532 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 6 | 12 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-12 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |