Head to head
StarHunt vs Gitcontribute
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hiring developers? Find and source software engineers by what they build on GitHub.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Gitcontribute (92/100 against 70). StarHunt is hosted and callable through the gateway; Gitcontribute runs on your own machine. Gitcontribute has noticeably more public adoption.
| StarHunt | Gitcontribute | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 3 |
| Downloads / week | – | 148 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |