Head to head
mcpm vs Yotta Verify
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Pre-install security scanner for AI agent skills (local stdio MCP). Offline static scan; no upload.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Yotta Verify (91/100 against 83).
| mcpm | Yotta Verify | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 3 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 349 | 567 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 10 | — |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |