Head to head
mcpm vs isMalicious threat intelligence for AI agents
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
mcpm
Bio.github.getmcpm/cliNo reviews yet
MCP security guard + package manager: trust-scored installs, blocks prompt injection and rug-pulls.
Full listingNo reviews yet
Indicator reputation verdicts, CVE lookups (CVSS, EPSS, KEV) and prompt-injection scans for agents
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours mcpm (83/100 against 58). mcpm has noticeably more public adoption.
| mcpm | isMalicious threat intelligence for AI agents | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B83/100 | C58/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 3 | – |
| Downloads / week | 349 | 36 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 10 | 6 |
| Write actions | 1 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | — |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |