Head to head
Hamster vs Wundervault
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search and manage Hamster briefs, tasks, plans, and knowledge; trigger delivery from your agent.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Zero-knowledge MCP secrets vault for AI agents: secrets injected at runtime, never seen by the model
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Hamster (98/100 against 66). Hamster is hosted and callable through the gateway; Wundervault runs on your own machine.
| Hamster | Wundervault | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A98/100 | C66/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 9 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | – | 292 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 2 |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-14 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |