Mmcp.market

Head to head

GeoLens vs MCP Server

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

GeoLensio.github.geolens-io/geolens
B
No reviews yet

Read-only access to a self-hosted GeoLens spatial catalog: datasets, features, maps, sandboxed SQL.

Full listing
MCP Serverio.github.tickerbot/mcp-server
A
No reviews yet

The stock market, in SQL — scan, replay, or subscribe across ~12k US tickers and top 100 cryptos.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours MCP Server (90/100 against 82). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; GeoLens runs on your own machine. GeoLens has noticeably more public adoption.

 GeoLensMCP Server
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeB82/100A90/100
AdoptionEstablishedGrowing
GitHub stars2480
Downloads / week32080
Runs whereYour machine (local)Hosted (remote)
Gateway-readyNoYes
Tools632
Write actions110
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceApache-2.0MIT
Last release2026-09-182026-09-17
CategoryDatabasesDatabases

Other comparisons

GeoLens vs Memory VaultGeoLens vs Cortex RMCPGeoLens vs DBHubGeoLens vs LINQ to DBGeoLens vs StackQL MCP ServerAll Databases servers