Head to head
GeoEDGE MCP vs World Model MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Geospatial analysis: vector and raster GIS operations, cartographic maps, spatial data access
Full listingNo reviews yet
Persistent 3D/2D spatial world model for AI agents with entity tracking and simulation.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours World Model MCP (94/100 against 55). World Model MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| GeoEDGE MCP | World Model MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C55/100 | A94/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 20 |
| Downloads / week | 431 | 4.2k |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 1 | 15 |
| Write actions | 1 | 3 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | LicenseRef-Proprietary | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-15 |
| Category | AI and agents | AI and agents |