Head to head
MCP Safety Warden vs Raven Nest
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP proxy adding security scanning, behavioral profiling, risk gating, and safe tool call execution.
Full listingNo reviews yet
AI-driven penetration testing - 22 security tools behind safety-hardened MCP endpoints
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Raven Nest (88/100 against 80).
| MCP Safety Warden | Raven Nest | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | New |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 2 |
| Downloads / week | 107 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 25 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Security | Security |