Head to head
MCP Safety Warden vs IdentArk Gateway
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP proxy adding security scanning, behavioral profiling, risk gating, and safe tool call execution.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Zero-secret MCP gateway for AI agents: risk-scored, audited calls with human-in-the-loop approval.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours IdentArk Gateway (88/100 against 80). IdentArk Gateway is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCP Safety Warden runs on your own machine.
| MCP Safety Warden | IdentArk Gateway | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B80/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 8 | 11 |
| Downloads / week | 107 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 25 | — |
| Write actions | 4 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | NOASSERTION | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-08-12 | 2026-09-09 |
| Category | Security | Security |