Head to head
Gagarin Cloud vs Woodpecker CI
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Deploy and operate containers on Gagarin Cloud: services, databases, domains, logs, rollbacks.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Read Woodpecker CI repositories, pipelines and logs, and drive builds, secrets and crons
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Gagarin Cloud (93/100 against 83). Gagarin Cloud is hosted and callable through the gateway; Woodpecker CI runs on your own machine.
| Gagarin Cloud | Woodpecker CI | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A93/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 31 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 71 |
| Write actions | — | 27 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |