Head to head
FrameOn — Agentic Project Management vs Obsidian Turbocharged
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Project management for AI agents: tasks, docs, decisions and time in one shared team context.
Full listingObsidian Turbocharged
Cio.github.The-40-Thieves/obsidian-tcNo reviews yet
Model-agnostic, agent-ready Obsidian MCP server with RBAC, SLSA provenance, and native search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (70 and 65 out of 100). FrameOn — Agentic Project Management is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Turbocharged runs on your own machine. Obsidian Turbocharged has noticeably more public adoption.
| FrameOn — Agentic Project Management | Obsidian Turbocharged | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | B70/100 | C65/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 5 |
| Downloads / week | – | 757 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |