Head to head
FoxNose Knowledge vs DocsMint
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hybrid search, schema introspection and record read/write over FoxNose collections
Full listing
No reviews yet
Cloud or self-hosted knowledge for AI agents: hybrid search, reranking, GraphRAG, scoped MCP tools.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours DocsMint (96/100 against 60). DocsMint has noticeably more public adoption.
| FoxNose Knowledge | DocsMint | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C60/100 | A96/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 55 |
| Downloads / week | – | 928 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-16 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |