Head to head
Runtime vs Reversecore MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Security-first MCP server for reverse engineering, malware analysis, forensics, and SAST.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Reversecore MCP (77/100 against 57). Runtime is hosted and callable through the gateway; Reversecore MCP runs on your own machine. Reversecore MCP has noticeably more public adoption.
| Runtime | Reversecore MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 203 |
| Downloads / week | – | 128 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | 44 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |