Head to head
Travel Assistant vs Trips
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
No-key travel MCP for Claude Desktop, Codex-style agents, Hermes, and other clients.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Hand someone a complete trip as a private, editable map link. No account, no API key, no card.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Trips (85/100 against 65). Trips is hosted and callable through the gateway; Travel Assistant runs on your own machine. Trips has noticeably more public adoption.
| Travel Assistant | Trips | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C65/100 | A85/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 33 | 277 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 5 | 6 |
| Write actions | — | 1 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Maps and travel | Maps and travel |