Head to head
Fold Laboratories Art Catalogue vs Marm
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
Fold Laboratories Art Catalogue
Ccom.foldlaboratories/artNo reviews yet
Original art from galleries and artists: semantic search, provenance, live availability.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Universal MCP Server with advanced AI memory capabilities and semantic search.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Marm (92/100 against 67). Fold Laboratories Art Catalogue is hosted and callable through the gateway; Marm runs on your own machine. Marm has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fold Laboratories Art Catalogue | Marm | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 383 |
| Downloads / week | – | 532 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 3 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Web search | Web search |