Head to head
Fmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs MCPProxy
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Local-first MCP proxy with BM25 tool discovery, security scanning, quarantine & ~99% token savings
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Fmind AI Security Architect Portfolio (91/100 against 73). Fmind AI Security Architect Portfolio is hosted and callable through the gateway; MCPProxy runs on your own machine. MCPProxy has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fmind AI Security Architect Portfolio | MCPProxy | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A91/100 | B73/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 0 | 377 |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 9 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Security | Security |
Other comparisons
Fmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs Reversecore MCPFmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs npm Registry MCP ServerFmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs VMware NSX SecurityFmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs TrentFmind AI Security Architect Portfolio vs Cybersec ToolkitAll Security servers