Head to head
Obsidian Hybrid Search vs Xome
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Search Obsidian vaults with hybrid full-text, fuzzy, semantic, and graph retrieval.
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Xome (77/100 against 57). Xome is hosted and callable through the gateway; Obsidian Hybrid Search runs on your own machine. Obsidian Hybrid Search has noticeably more public adoption.
| Obsidian Hybrid Search | Xome | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C57/100 | B77/100 |
| Adoption | Established | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 104 | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 674 | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | — | 38 |
| Write actions | — | 4 |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | MIT |
| Last release | 2026-09-17 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Productivity | Productivity |