Head to head
Fiskmas vs AppCrane
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
Hosting for AI agents: your AI client deploys Docker apps to live HTTPS URLs over MCP.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Deploy and manage apps on your own AppCrane instance, the self-hosted PaaS for AI-built apps.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AppCrane (83/100 against 64). Fiskmas is hosted and callable through the gateway; AppCrane runs on your own machine. AppCrane has noticeably more public adoption.
| Fiskmas | AppCrane | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C64/100 | B83/100 |
| Adoption | New | Growing |
| GitHub stars | – | 0 |
| Downloads / week | – | 382 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | 21 | — |
| Write actions | 6 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | MIT |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-13 |
| Category | Developer tools | Developer tools |