Head to head
MCP Server vs mcp-video
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
MCP server for the FFmpeg Micro video transcoding API — create, monitor, download transcodes.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Compatibility package: mcp-video now installs Kinocut (formerly mcp-video).
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (86 and 91 out of 100). MCP Server is hosted and callable through the gateway; mcp-video runs on your own machine. mcp-video has noticeably more public adoption.
| MCP Server | mcp-video | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A86/100 | A91/100 |
| Adoption | Growing | Established |
| GitHub stars | 1 | 160 |
| Downloads / week | 74 | 335 |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | No |
| Tools | — | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | 2026-08-19 | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Media | Media |