Head to head
feed-digest vs Netdata
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
feed-digest
Cco.kymac.feeds/feed-digestNo reviews yet
RSS/Atom URL → structured items for bots. Free try then prepaid TEST. https://feeds.kymac.co
Full listing
No reviews yet
Real-time infrastructure monitoring with metrics, logs, alerts, and ML-based anomaly detection.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Netdata (88/100 against 67). Netdata has noticeably more public adoption.
| feed-digest | Netdata | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A88/100 |
| Adoption | New | Widely used |
| GitHub stars | – | 81k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | 7 | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | GPL-3.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-19 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |