Head to head
feed-digest vs Grafana
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
feed-digest
Cco.kymac.feeds/feed-digestNo reviews yet
RSS/Atom URL → structured items for bots. Free try then prepaid TEST. https://feeds.kymac.co
Full listing
The short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours Grafana (98/100 against 67). Grafana has noticeably more public adoption.
| feed-digest | Grafana | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | C67/100 | A98/100 |
| Adoption | New | Established |
| GitHub stars | – | 3.5k |
| Downloads / week | – | – |
| Runs where | Hosted (remote) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | Yes | Yes |
| Tools | 12 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | — | Apache-2.0 |
| Last release | — | 2026-09-18 |
| Category | Everything else | Everything else |