Mmcp.market

Head to head

FEDLIN Scanners vs PDF

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

FEDLIN Scannerscom.fedlin/fedlin-mcp-server
C
No reviews yet

Exposes FEDLIN's public security scanners as agent-callable tools over Streamable HTTP.

Full listing
PDFio.github.jztan/pdf-mcp
A
No reviews yet

Agentic RAG over one PDF or a whole folder: hybrid search, selective page reads, tables, OCR.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours PDF (85/100 against 60). FEDLIN Scanners is hosted and callable through the gateway; PDF runs on your own machine. PDF has noticeably more public adoption.

 FEDLIN ScannersPDF
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeC60/100A85/100
AdoptionNewEstablished
GitHub stars–136
Downloads / week–1.2k
Runs whereHosted (remote)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyYesNo
Tools313
Write actions1—
Price per callFreeFree
Licence—MIT
Last release—2026-09-19
CategoryAI and agentsAI and agents

Other comparisons

FEDLIN Scanners vs MockserverFEDLIN Scanners vs Agent CommsFEDLIN Scanners vs CHAP CoordinatorFEDLIN Scanners vs three.ws MarketplaceFEDLIN Scanners vs Tw Legal RagAll AI and agents servers