Head to head
AIHawk vs Uindow
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Real signed-browser automation for AI agents, over a local stdio MCP server.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 92 out of 100). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.
| AIHawk | Uindow | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A92/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 32k | 6 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | 427 |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Your machine (local) |
| Gateway-ready | No | No |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | NOASSERTION |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-12 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |