Head to head
AIHawk vs MCP
Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.
No reviews yet
AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.
Full listing
No reviews yet
Render 47 chart types and tiled dashboards as PNG/SVG. Deterministic, no headless browser.
Full listingThe short version
Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 99 out of 100). MCP is hosted and callable through the gateway; AIHawk runs on your own machine. AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.
| AIHawk | MCP | |
|---|---|---|
| User rating | No reviews yet | No reviews yet |
| Safety grade | A92/100 | A99/100 |
| Adoption | Widely used | Growing |
| GitHub stars | 32k | 0 |
| Downloads / week | 6.0k | – |
| Runs where | Your machine (local) | Hosted (remote) |
| Gateway-ready | No | Yes |
| Tools | 16 | — |
| Write actions | — | — |
| Price per call | Free | Free |
| Licence | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Last release | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-11 |
| Category | Scraping and browsing | Scraping and browsing |