Mmcp.market

Head to head

AIHawk vs Browser Automation

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing
Browser Automationio.github.mindstone/mcp-server-browser-automation
A
No reviews yet

Browser automation MCP server: navigate, fill forms, click, screenshot, and manage tabs

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. Both score close on the safety scan (92 and 94 out of 100). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 AIHawkBrowser Automation
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100A94/100
AdoptionWidely usedGrowing
GitHub stars32k12
Downloads / week6.0k163
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—21
Write actions—2
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITNOASSERTION
Last release2026-09-182026-09-13
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AIHawk vs Openbrowser AIAIHawk vs Oya BrowserAIHawk vs Aginx BrowserAIHawk vs unbrowser by UnchainedAIHawk vs SeleniumBase MCPAll Scraping and browsing servers