Mmcp.market

Head to head

AIHawk vs x-use

Same numbers we show everywhere else, lined up. Ratings come from users, the grade comes from our scanner, adoption comes from public registries.

AIHawkio.github.feder-cr/aihawk
A
No reviews yet

AI browser agent: browses, clicks, types, and reads real web pages from plain-English instructions.

Full listing
x-useio.github.ihuzaifashoukat/x-use
B
No reviews yet

Browser-native AI agents for X (Twitter): multi-account, MCP-ready, no X API key required.

Full listing

The short version

Neither has been reviewed yet, so the comparison rests on the scan and the public usage numbers. The safety scan favours AIHawk (92/100 against 78). AIHawk has noticeably more public adoption.

 AIHawkx-use
User ratingNo reviews yetNo reviews yet
Safety gradeA92/100B78/100
AdoptionWidely usedGrowing
GitHub stars32k168
Downloads / week6.0k48
Runs whereYour machine (local)Your machine (local)
Gateway-readyNoNo
Tools—33
Write actions—11
Price per callFreeFree
LicenceMITMIT
Last release2026-09-182026-08-18
CategoryScraping and browsingScraping and browsing

Other comparisons

AIHawk vs Openbrowser AIAIHawk vs Oya BrowserAIHawk vs Aginx BrowserAIHawk vs unbrowser by UnchainedAIHawk vs BRYGAll Scraping and browsing servers